Sunday, March 30, 2014

On Educator's Opting Out & Children Leading

IMAGE: Mother Jones leading a children's march
against exploitation circa 1903 (OpEdNews)
I recently posted this comment on a Social Network page:


So I have a question I posed earlier on another page: has anybody explored the option of teachers opting out of administering tests for religious reasons? Why would it be any different than a parent opting a child out for religious reasons? It would seem to me that if an employer suddenly was asking you to do something that you believed to be morally and ethically wrong, you would have the same right to refuse, under religious protection. It frustrates me to see teachers-and parents- complaining about how much instruction time this takes up, yet not willing to actually do anything about it. I understand the concerns and fears-but then I look at my daughter, who is being teased by many kids now-(and admired by some others)-and she is acting for what she knows is right in spite of her fears. I wonder why more of the adults who are helping perpetuate what amounts to a takeover of our schools, can't start a "Teachers Opt Out" movement and help stop it? From where I am sitting, being passively subversive is not enough anymore. I am watching kids get intimidated, lied to and bullied by staff over these tests. It will take more than angry parents and stressed kids to get rid of this."

A commenter asked to share it and another said that religious reasons would not work in a public school setting-but educational objections might. That commenter expressed the idea that kids should be the ones to deliver 'the message' and that kids should lead this.

Below is my response, with a few modifications, that I felt was important enough to put in blog post form:


@---- , Absolutely! Please share the idea of teachers opting out of administering standardized testing for religious reasons as much as you want-the more the better! I would love to explore options and start a movement.

And @----, I understand what you are saying about the educational arguments-which are valid-however, in spite of educational arguments, educator observations and psychologists data proving that these tests are NOT age or developmentally appropriate, and are actually CAUSING behavior and other serious emotional disturbances in children, districts are still implementing them as well as the Common Core. I would think that a school district would be less inclined to challenge educators' religious beliefs-because once they do that, they open themselves up to a Pandora's box of repercussions. Insist that your union backs you all on this. 

Remember that Religious freedom is what our country was founded on and is a valid reason to object to this. The "reforms" we see can be viewed as an attempt to bring Socialist ideals into our schools to indoctrinate our kids with half-truths, deceptions and outright lies. Its abuse to put it mildly. The biggest religious objection to this is that socialist ideals enslave and indoctrinate, and take away an individuals ability to use their God-given free will-their power of thought and choice-or face intimidation and harassment.  

The CC and these tests are a HUGE deception in themselves-they are being used to manipulate the (false) data to  "show" that our kids, teachers and schools are failing. They are designed to make everyone fail-(especially the least among us-the special needs children) so that the gov/business can take over the schools. This is a deception by design and the search for a higher Truth is at the heart of any religion. 

The testing is not about children succeeding - its about placing False Gods - the education companies' promise of money - before the greater good. To say that the kids need to deliver the message is missing the entire point and, in my opinion, a cop out. That "child shall lead them" quote is often taken completely out of context. It does not mean that kids will lead adults. That passage is about the lion, lamb and other creatures living in Peace-and the child being able to go near them without fear of harm. 

But let's take that thought of a child leading a little bit further, and ask ourselves just how much more do we want to dump on the kids? 

The kids have ALL of this dumped on them. They have so much pressure. If they don't "do well" on the tests, then they themselves, their teachers AND their school 'fails'. This is what they are told, over and over again. 

In addition, we are dumping the cost of this implementation on them as well as other debt on them. A child born today will owe $1,532,026 in National Debt, and by the time I update this post that number will climb even higher. 

This is NOT the kids responsibility to lead or to clean this up. WE did this and WE need to fix it: the administrators and school boards who gave in to the bribe and promise of funding, the teachers who passively sat there and did not object until it was tied to their evaluations, the parents that were not involved nor proactive in their child's education, and people in general not ensuring that our local and federal government does the right thing. It is our responsibility to take care of and support the kids-not the other way around. They have been used enough and its time we all act to put a stop to it.

The kids need support from LEADERS-adults-parents AND their teachers and administrators who will protect them from and stand by them on this, not people who are afraid to open their mouths when injustice and abuse is taking place all around them. In a school setting especially, there is a huge imbalance of power between children and adults, no matter how outspoken the student is. 

Many kids don't understand the depth of the issues, nor the far reaching consequences, and are simply too scared: scared of "failing", of being teased, of being singled out, and of "getting in trouble" if they don't comply. Excessive sensitivity training, the CC and hype/indoctrination over the "importance" of the tests has ensured that they are too scared to object on their own and think that if they refuse or make waves they will be hurting their schools & teachers. Parents are being told the same thing. They are being bullied and used by state DOEs and local administrators to perpetuate this lie. Our kids are the "Useful Innocents" and WE - adults - have to be aware, present and assertive enough to recognize this, and to stand up and intervene in effective ways to stop the abusive forced compliance. 

If educators are who are reporting & resisting abuse, injustices and crimes are being treated as if they are the ones committing the abuse, injustices & crimes, then they are being governed by the criminals. We need to act now.


So what say you? Do you think a "Teachers Opt Out" movement would be successful? Are you a teacher who would be willing to find out? Let's give it some serious thought as to what this would look like.

In the meantime, if anyone needs additional inspiration for parent or teacher religious objections, please refer to my most recent note on the left column of my Barbara Gini  [Facebook] page. It is my letter to my daughter's school explaining what my own personal objections are, but it may be helpful in realizing & finding a way to verbalize your own moral/ethical objections.


Fell free to e-mail me: bg.bgini@gmail.com


Additional Reading:

Freedom Heroes: Mother Jones

United Opt Out National

.




Sunday, March 16, 2014

Standardized Testing (Just Say No)

IMAGE: Big Education Ape
It’s that time of year when we change the clocks back, look forward to Spring weather, and prepare for the standardized tests...no...wait...

Every spring-its just insane that we subject any child (or teacher) to a full two weeks or more of these pointless tests: Test that only serve to supersede real classroom learning and that help to expand the private for-profit testing industry.

If just a mere 10% of the students refuse to take the tests, its considered invalid and the current practice will most likely be stopped.

According to the Article below:

If the [standardized] tests fail to test the same percentage each year, ALL of the statistical information and scores are invalidated.

That’s why there is so much pressure on the schools to have 100% test participation. This is why there is the threat of the school "failing" if the percentage for an entire school (or for any measurable subgroup of students) falls below 95% participation. Its all a huge manipulation, designed to make schools "fail" so gov has an excuse to take them over.

For smaller and rural schools, test scores are statistically meaningless - yet they STILL have to administer standardized tests, or it could open a door for lawsuits if other schools were to sue under the "equal protection" clause.

U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan stated earlier this week that the Dept of Education predicts 82% of schools will fail this year no matter what we do.

82%? How did he arrive at that number? (Must be Common Core Math...)

So let's pretend that 82% of all schools will fail no matter what... then why are we even going through the motions? And from a financial position, it costs more taxpayer money (some districts in PA report up to $9 million) to administer and score these tests than any funding the government may be promising over several years. Do the actual math!!

It makes more sense for the schools to "fail" (supposedly) because parents and kids say NO to testing rather than putting the burden and the blame on the kids who just don't test well, or who don't feel well that day, or the kids with special needs, kids living in poverty, kids struggling with English, and their teachers.

In addition, there are about 400 different pieces of personal data that is collected on each child who takes these tests. We have no control over how that data is used or who sees it. Why do they need to know so much about our kids?

This is not only unnecessary, but is also morally and ethically wrong to perpetuate this farce that the tests will somehow magically help our children "compete in a global economy". Neither colleges nor employers pay much attention to test scores-in fact when was the last time you asked your dentist, accountant, personal trainer, school nurse, mechanic, hairstylist (or even Arne Duncan) to see his/her standardized test scores?  Don't buy it. Its swamp land.

We are being sold the biggest truckload of BS in education history.

An assessment can be a useful tool for an educator to measure student progress in an area-but not the way these are being pushed like they as important as air. Don't be emotional-but DO be calm & firm in your refusal to allow this madness to continue. If you are still participating in these tests, then you and your child are being used and are part of the problem. The powers that be don't care that kids who have potential are falling through the cracks-and that great teachers are leaving the field altogether, because the tests were NEVER about helping kids or building better schools in the first place.

Read:

If Ten Percent Refuse...



Further Reading:


What 400 Data Points

'Sit and Stare'-What some kids who refuse tests are forced to do

College Applicants Sweat the SATs. Perhaps they Shouldn't

ICYMI: AP Scores Don't Matter in College Admission

Why Google Doesn't Care about Hiring Top College Graduates

What Standardized Tests really Tell Us

United Opt Out

FairTest.org





.







Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Is Common Core an Attack on American Culture?


IMAGE:
Happy Birthday, Miss Jones
by Norman Rockwell
Saturday Evening Post
As parents, educators and students continue to debate the validity of Common Core, it is becoming more and more difficult to sift through the information.

You may have noticed that it’s [intentionally] difficult to define the actual Common Core standards. When you ask for a simple definition, you get contradicting, lengthy and confusing answers.

Even the mission statement at the Common Core State Standards Initiative web site is not clear.

Victoria Jackson writes on her blog:

"Deceptive titles like “college ready,” “rigorous standards,” and “sustainability” hide the secret global agenda, that began a century ago with socialist American and British elites, (names below), some of whom funded Communism in Russia, “who shared a globalist vision of a totalitarian world equipped to conform young minds to a socialist humanistic system.”

And Diane Ravitch (historian of education and Research Professor of Education at New York University) writes: 

"In an earlier post today, I described the use of FUD (fear, uncertainty,and doubt) to destroy public confidence in public education and thus pave the way for privatization. The vendors of FUD say our education system, which made this country great, is failing; that it is obsolete; that we are losing the global race. It is a massive hoax, a fraud, a lie. They want to frighten the public and open the door to privatization and profiteering."

So the question remains: Is Common Core an attack on American values and culture?

Read Victoria's blog here:

The Secret Common Core is Hiding

Read Diane's blog Here:

FUD in Education




Further Reading:

The Myth of Common Core Equity

Common Core Licensing Agreement 
(Pay special attention to the Representations, Warranties and Disclaimer" as well as the "Limitation on Liability" paragraphs.)



What are your thoughts? Do you feel that the Common Core Curriculum is a good thing, a bad thing or have not decided? Please leave your comments below.


.

George Carlin on Politically Correct Language


George Carlin: 1937 - 2008
Do you find yourself constantly trying to find the "right" words-so as not to accidentally "offend" anyone? Are the extra syllables and prepositional phrases starting to get old? Are you surrounded by people who constantly expect you to try to redefine the language like they do, to suit their own personal and political viewpoints?

The late George Carlin did not like political correctness - words that hide the truth or conceal reality. He preferred to "tell it like it is", and not only entertained us, but educated us.

In this video at the link below, "George Carlin on "Soft Language", he calls us out on our overuse of euphemisms for the purpose of dodging reality. This is especially timely in the wake of the recent attempt by the Girl Scouts to "Ban Bossy".

WARNING: Language and lewdness. NOT FOR KIDS!!


George Carlin on "Soft Language



Further Reading:


Dear Sheryl Sandberg: There Are Far Worse Things Than Being Called Bossy

Sheryl Sandberg Wrong on "Bossy" Ban

The problem with Political Correctness







Common Core Concerns Motivate AFT to Find Alternate Funding Source

IMAGE: EdReach.com
Randi Weingarten-president of the American Federation of Teachers, recently announced that the union will no longer accept money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, for its Innovation Fund. The fund was founded in 2009 and has received up to $1 million each year in grants from Gates ever since.

The Innovation Fund has been used for efforts to help teachers implement the Common Core standards, however, union members have expressed a high level of mistrust in the manner in which the standards are being implemented as well as the fact that standardized tests are already aligned to the poorly rolled out standards.

Read the full article here:

Truth in American Education: AFT Ends Gates Funding Over Common Core Concerns


Further Reading:

Are We Drinking the Common Core Kool Aid?



.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Ban Bossy? Have the Girl Scouts Sold Our Daughters Out?

IMAGE: banbossy.com
Have you heard of the "Ban Bossy" campaign sponsored by the Girl Scouts?

I have always thought that the Girl Scouts organization was supposed to be "Leadership Training" for girls and young women. How does banning words develop a leader?

How can the Girl Scouts be taken seriously and how can any girl ever be a true leader if we continue to insist on things like "banning" words and engaging in this kind of weak thinking? Its not kind and compassionate-its dis-empowering.

A true leader has the strength of self-respect, self-awareness, self-reliance and is confident enough to take the lead when others cannot or will not. These are the qualities we need to work on-not avoiding words or opinions that hurt our feelings. Feelings are temporary-and so are words, and yet we are giving them eternal life every single time we attempt to "ban" certain ones by creating a campaign to do so.

And since when do we think we can or should "ban" words? Since when do we think its OK to discourage free thinking, having an opinion and Freedom of Speech? How can we allow free speech for some, yet want to ban words that we [incorrectly] deem as offensive for others? What message does this send our youth?

We also have to remember that in terms of language development, most kids don't understand the concept of "assertive" yet-so "bossy" is an easy-to-say, substitute word that describes the actions of a classmate who is "assertive". When kids call other kids "bossy", are they really using it as a put-down, or is it just that they don't have other vocabulary words yet to more accurately describe the character trait they are witnessing? Before we start banning words because our own emotions attach a negative meaning to them, we need to really look at where the kids/adults are as far as language development and usage.

I teach my daughter to think before she speaks, but that banning words and politically correct speech is not required of her. I have taught her from a young age that words have no inherent power to harm of offend unless we give them that power and allow them to. We give those 'banned' words power-and we can give them other meanings just as easily as trying to ban them.

I teach my daughter to think and speak truthfully, and the truth is, that most people don't even know they are, or should be offended until someone tells them that they are-or should be. I have always taught her that when someone calls her "bossy" she knows that they recognize her as a leader. I help her find other words that define what a true leader is and should be.

The "PC" push and guilt tripping if you accidentally use an "offensive" word is just another way to erode our rights and remove independent thinking. Being "offended" is only a way to gain attention-to impose guilt and division as it simultaneously exposes your deepest fears and weaknesses. It is also the most manipulative lie you can tell-its simply not true, because if you (or someone else) are that easily offended by a word, especially one that is not intended to insult or offend, then there is a much deeper problem.

 In the "Ban Bossy" download "Leadership Tips for Girls" Tip #2 contradicts the whole idea of "Ban Bossy" by suggesting girls: "Stop apologizing before you speak". I say yes-STOP apologizing and stop "banning" words. Show your true strength and character and when someone calls your daughter bossy, tell her to stand tall and say "I think you mean "assertive"- and that is part of what makes me a true leader."




We want to know what you think: Should we "ban bossy" or just leave it alone? 
Please leave your opinion in the comments area below.



Further Reading:

Sports for Girls Encourage Self-Empowerment
11 Facts about Teens and Self-Esteem

The Key to Raising Confident Kids? Stop Complimenting Them

The Optimistic Child: A Proven Program to Safeguard Children Against Depression and Build Lifelong Resilience 

Do Dolls Influence Girl's Self Image?




Help Wanted: Test Scorer. No Experience Necessary.

IMAGE: Washington Post 
After three years working as a test scorer, Dan DiMaggio says he's become a skimming machine. "It's ugly," he says. "You just go as fast as possible."

"The legitimacy of testing is being taken for granted," he says. "It's a farce."

The following article is well researched and written and describes a day in the life of a test scorer. Its a MUST read for parents of children who take these these tests. I will not give any more commentary-the article speaks for itself.

Inside the Multi-million-dollar essay-scoring Business: Behind the Scenes of Standardized Testing.


Further Reading:

New Study Finds That Colleges Don’t Need the SAT or the ACT

Pearson's Problems with Testing

FairTest.org (Test opt-out information)

Why School Isn't for Children Anymore

SAT: Part Hoax, Part Fraud


Contact: bg.bgini@gmail.com
.